'Do Bailouts Provide Good Returns? Evidence from the U.S. Financial Crisis of 2007-2009'
This research deals not only with the practical question of whether the American bailouts during the 2007-09 financial crisis were costly for taxpayers, but also the more theoretical questions of whether the bailout programs provided an adequate rate of return, and indeed of what is the proper rate of return in this context, when we are talking about an investment of government funds rather than private funds. Professor Squire advances the thesis that the bailouts provided an adequate return by any reasonable measure, and thus cannot plausibly be cited as a significant source of moral hazard, at least in the main part. Needless to say, the claim is controversial and should invite discussions.
The paper will be sent to you upon registration. The seminar will be held in room A2.10 of the of the Amsterdam Law School, building A (of the Roeterseilandcampus). Please register before January 18th by sending an e-mail to email@example.com.
Richard Squire has been a member of the Fordham faculty since 2006. He publishes primarily on the subjects of corporate law and corporate bankruptcy, and he has also written articles on antitrust and securities regulation. He has twice been elected Fordham Law School's Teacher of the Year, in 2010 and 2011. He previously taught at Harvard College, where he won the Allyn Young Award for excellence in teaching principles of economics. From 2001 to 2002 he clerked for Judge Robert D. Sack on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and between 2002 and 2005 he was an associate with Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz in New York City.
ACT). ACT’s objective is to explore the role of private law in the making of society, as well as the processes of private law-making in a pluriform world.