For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.

Take notice: Faculty of Law (Faculteitskamer - A1.01). Title: "How Can Behavioural Economics Inform the Law? An Example from Unfair Pricing?". Doors open from 11.45, lunch will be served.

Event details of ACLE Economic Evidence in Legal Procedures Seminar: Pinar Akman (University of Leeds)
Date 10 March 2014
Time 11:45 -13:15
Location Oudemanhuispoort
Room Faculty of Law: Oudemanhuispoort - Faculteitskamer - A1.01


A dominant firm can abuse its position by charging unfair prices under EU competition law. According to the Court of Justice of the European Union inUnited Brands, a price is abusive if (1) the price-cost margin is excessive and (2) the price is unfair compared with other prices. However, there is little guidance to determine whether a price-cost margin is excessive and, if so, when the price is unfair. We consider whether the “principle of dual entitlement”, which is consistent with most people’s perceptions of when prices are unfair relative to others, can be used to define explicitly what constitutes an unfair price in terms of the second stage of the United Brands test. We show that in general, this principle is in line with the goals of an effective prohibition on unfairly high pricing, and we develop a procedure that defines a price as unfair in terms of this principle. We also show that European competition law enforcers, in their attempts to define prices as unfair relative to other prices, have followed arguments similar to the procedure developed here. Therefore, this procedure could go some way to resolve one of a number of problems regarding the prohibition on unfairly high pricing.


Room Faculty of Law: Oudemanhuispoort - Faculteitskamer - A1.01

Oudemanhuispoort 4-6
1012 CN Amsterdam